This tutorial that we had recently was more light a tutorial for Law. We had to form 2 groups and discuss the recent controversy over the FBI wanting to crack a terrorist's phone to recieve information, however it can't be done since no one can crack an iPhone password and they want Apple to develop a cracking software that would only be used for these occasions and that only they could use. Apple said no. Many called that obstruction of the apprehension of terrorists. However it was obviously just their dedication towards the privacy of their customers. I was on the side agreeing with Apple's decision. The others were against it.
I enjoyed the debate and from the looks of it, we won. It was my belief that once a crack was created, it would be highly sought after to be replicated. Also if the FBI say they would only use it on occasions were terrorists are involved, what's to stop them cracking the phone of a non-terrorist while using the terrorist-card. Also know as 'The threat of terrorism.
The other group had good points but all in all, we had more information whereas they repeated the same answers over and over again.
No comments:
Post a Comment